Conclusions, Perspective

Re-Distributed by http://www.tpub.com

Acknowledgement

Conclusions, Perspective

This work was supported by the NTSB, and

The maximum available energy inside the

the Aviation Safety Program Office at NASA

TWA-800 passenger cabin from external sources

Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.

identified by the JSC was less than 0.1 mJ. A new

NASA LaRC-developed numerical analysis code

References

estimated that the CWT FQIS coupled energy levels

[1] Scarry, Elaine, 4/9/1998, "The Fall of TWA-

were several orders of magnitude less than the

800: The Possibility of Electromagnetic Inter-

maximum available energy. Therefore, these

ference", The NY Review of Books, pp. 59-76.

external sources could not have caused CWT

ignition.

[2] Macrae, M., D. Hughes, 1/1999, "TWA Flight

800 Electromagnetic Environment", United States

It was determined that typical, commercially

DoD JSC Report JSC-CR-99-006,

available PEDs in 1996 radiated less than 10 W of

power between 27 MHz and 1 GHz frequency. A

[3] DoD Interface Standard, MIL-STD-464,

minimum power level of 10 W was applied to the

3/18/1997, "Electromagnetic Environmental Effects

FQIS terminals in the laboratory installation over a

Requirements for Systems", Sec A5.8.2

frequency band of 25 MHz to 1 GHz, with no

[4] Fisher, F. A., J. A. Plumer and R. A. Perala,

electrical discharge or significant heating detected.

1990, Lightning Protection of Aircraft, Lightning

A supplemental test, using an intermittent short

Technologies Inc., p. 174.

circuit at a FQIS location selected for peak voltage

enhancements, induced discharge events with as

[5] Ely, J.J., T.X. Nguyen, K.L. Dudley, S.A.

little as 1.5 W of applied RF power. Considering

Scearce, F.B. Beck, M.D. Deshpande, C.R. Cockrel,

the passenger cabin-to-CWT FQIS coupling loss,

3/2000, "Investigation of Electromagnetic Field

this power was at least 10 times greater than the

Threat to Fuel Tank Wiring of a Transport

maximum PED threat, even if the PED transmitted

Aircraft", NASA TP-2000-209867

from an optimal coupling location in the passenger

[6] Deshpande, M. D., C. R. Cockrell, F. B. Beck,

cabin.

10/2000, "Estimation of Electromagnetic Energy

Laboratory testing to determine the absolute

Coupling to a Wire Residing Inside a Transport

minimum power required for a discharge was

Aircraft Due to External Radiating Sources",

extended from 25 MHz down to 1 MHz frequency.

Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)

This testing revealed that an intermittent short

Proceedings, Paper # 236

circuit could cause discharge events with as little as

[7] F. A. Fisher, 3/2000, "Some Notes on Sparks

0.17 W of power at frequencies below 10 MHz,

and Ignition of Fuels", NASA/TM-2000-210077.

when applied to the FQIS location selected for peak

voltage enhancements. Analysis revealed that the

[8] Accardi, T. C., 8/20/1993, "Use of Portable

whole TWA-800 aircraft could not have coupled

Electronic Devices Aboard Aircraft", FAA

more than 0.015 W of power in this frequency

Advisory Circular AC No: 91.21-1

range from the surrounding electromagnetic

[9] Nguyen, T. X., K. L. Dudley, S. A. Scearce, J. J.

environment, at the time of the accident.

Ely, R. E. Richardson, M. O. Hatfield, 10/2000,

This effort focused exclusively on non-aircraft

"RF Coupling into the Fuel Tank of a Large

generated electromagnetic signals. Such signals are

Transport Aircraft from Intentionally Transmitting

far more likely to interfere with, and even damage,

PEDs in the Passenger Cabin", DASC Proceedings,

sensitive aircraft navigation sensors, displays,

Paper # 234

processors, and communication equipment, than to

[10] Scearce, S. A., K. L. Dudley, T. X. Nguyen, J.

create sparks within the CWT.

J. Ely, 10/2000, "The Use of Transmission Line

Impedance Measurements to Determine

Electromagnetic Comparability of FQIS Wiring

Installations", DASC Proceedings, Paper # 235