Click Here to
Order this information in Print

Click Here to
Order this information on CD-ROM

Click Here to
Download this information in PDF Format

 

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Myth: Changing the NCS Will Always Solve Net Problems!
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books

   
Back
Chapter 3- LINK-11 Fault Isolation
Up
Fire Controlman Volume 06-Digital Communications
Next
LINK-11  PROGRAMMED  FUNCTIONAL AND  OPERATIONAL  ANALYSIS  (POFAs)

on  to  junior  link  techs  and  the  mythology  developed  a  life  of  its  own.  In  the following paragraphs, we examine some of these myths and seek to clarify the real problems that led to the evolution of the myths. Myth: Changing the NCS Will Always Solve Net Problems! Changing  the  NCS  may  solve  net  problems,  but  only  if the  current  NCS  is causing the problem. What is the problem? If data is not being received from a unit because  the  current  NCS  has  entered  the  PU  number  incorrectly,  shifting  NCS functions to a station with the PU data entered correctly will solve the problem. However, it would be easier if the current NCS were simply to enter the correct PU numbers. When the current NCS is using a radio set with poor receiver sensitivity and is polling on top of picket responses, effectively jamming the entire net, changing NCS is imperative. Also, if several units are not recognizing their interrogations because the NCS is out of range or in an RF propagation shadow, changing to a unit in a better location should improve net communications. Myth: Changing Frequency Always Solves Net Problems! Here again is a myth that has some basis of fact. Changing frequency is a time- consuming process. When all the procedures are not carefully followed, changing the  frequency  induces  additional  problems  into  the  net.  This  myth  developed because improperly set switch positions and patch panel configurations were often set  to  the  proper  position  during  the  frequency  changing  process.  When  the  problem is  connectivity  on  the  current  frequency,  the  proper  action  is  to  find  a  better frequency. Myth: More Power Improves Link Performance! This is a myth. On the transmit side, the idea behind the myth is that keeping the link HF transmitter tuned to maximum output power will result in maximum area coverage. In  fact,  constantly  outputting  maximum  power  can  lead  to  serious RFI/EMI problems (on the ship doing so) and will not significantly increase the signal  propagation  range. The idea behind the myth on the receive side is that by keeping the HF receiver audio output control maximized, receive quality improves. In fact, maximizing the audio output saturates most data terminal sets. Saturation generally occurs in the DTS at around 3 dBm. Signal inputs above this level actually increase receive data errors. Myth: Dummy PUS Improve Link Quality! A dummy PU is an address insert into the polling sequence by the NCS for which there  is  no  live  unit.  Dummy  PUS  cause  the  net  cycle  time  to  increase  and  net efficiency to decrease. The idea that the NCS must use dummy PUS for the link to 3-2

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing