Click Here to
Order this information in Print

Click Here to
Order this information on CD-ROM

Click Here to
Download this information in PDF Format

 

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: THE FIRE CONTROL PROBLEM
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books

   
Back
Missile launch
Up
Fire Controlman Volume 02-Fire Control Radar Fundamentals (Revised)
Next
Tracking the Target

desperate attempt to break the radar lock, the pilot uses evasive   maneuvering.   It’s   too   late   though.   As   the missile   approaches   its   lethal   “kill   radius,”   the proximity fuze on the missile’s warhead detonates the missile’s explosive charge, sending fragments out in every direction,  destroying or neutralizing  the target (figure 2-24). This information is confirmed by your ship’s sensors. The radar continues to track that target as  it  falls  into  the  sea  and  the  ESM  equipment  goes silent. THE FIRE CONTROL PROBLEM The above scenario is not something out of a war novel, but rather an example of a possible engagement between a hostile force (the enemy attack aircraft) and a  Naval  Weapons  System  (the  ship).  This  scenario illustrates   the   concept   of   the   “detect-to-engage” sequence, which is an integral part of the modern Fire Control Problem. Although the scenario was one of a surface ship against an air target, every weapon system performs   the   same   functions:    target    detection, resolution   or   localization,   classification,   tracking, weapon  selection,  and  ultimately  neutralization.  In warfare, these functions are performed by submarines, aircraft,   tanks,   and   even   Marine   infantrymen.   The target may be either stationary or mobile; it may travel in space, through the air, on the ground or surface of the sea, or even beneath the sea (figure 2-25). It may be m a n n e d   o r   u n m a n n e d ,   g u i d e d   o r   u n g u i d e d , maneuverable or in a fixed trajectory. It may travel at speeds that range from a few knots to several times the speed of sound. The   term    weapons   system    is   a   generalization encompassing  a  broad  spectrum  of  components  and subsystems.   These   components   range   from   simple devices   operated   manually   by   a   single   person   to complex devices operated by computers. To  accomplish  one  specific  function,  a  complex array   of   subsystems   may   be   interconnected   by computers   and   data   communication   links.   This interconnecting  allows  the  array  to  perform  several f u n c t i o n s     o r     t o     e n g a g e     n u m e r o u s     t a r g e t s simultaneously.   Although   each   subsystem   may   be specifically designed to solve a particular part of the fire control problem, having these components operate in concert that allows the whole system to achieve its ultimate goal — the neutralization of the target. COMPONENTS All modern naval weapons systems, regardless of the medium they operate in or the type of weapon they use,  consist  of  the  basic  components  that  allow  the system to  detect, track  and  engage  the target. Sensor components must be designed for the environments in which the weapon system and the target operate. These components   must   also   be   capable   of   coping   with widely varying target characteristics, including target range, bearing, speed, heading, size and aspect. Detecting the Target There are three phases involved in target detection by a weapons system. The first phase is surveillance and  detection,  the  purpose  of  which  is  to  search  a predetermined area for a target and detect its presence. This may be accomplished actively, by sending energy out   into   the   medium   and   waiting   for   the   reflected energy to return, as in radar, or passively, by receiving energy being emitted by the target, as by ESM in our scenario. The second phase is to measure or localize the target’s position more accurately and by a series of such  measurements  estimate  its  behavior  or  motion relative   to   ownship.   This   is   done   by   repeatedly determining the target’s range, bearing, and depth or elevation. Finally, the target must be classified; that is, its  behavior  must  be  interpreted  to  estimate  its  type, number,   size   and   most   importantly   identity.   The capabilities of weapon system sensors are measured by 2-18 Figure 2-24. —Successful engagement of a missile.

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing