Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page
Page Title: States Are Using TANF Flexibility to Adapt Work Requirements and Time Limits to Meet State and Local Needs
Click here for thousands of PDF manuals
Home
Administration Comptroller General 2002 States Are Using TANF Flexibility to Adapt Work Requirements and Time Limits to Meet State and Local NeedsStates Are Using TANF Flexibility to Adapt Work Requirements and Time Limits to Meet State and Local NeedsFederal RequirementsSummaryTANF Establishes Time Limitsand Work Requirements for Adults Recieving AidTANF Establishes Time Limitsand Work Requirements for Adults Recieving Aid - ContinuedState May Choose Various State Funding Options for Providing Cash AssistanceTable 1: Application of Key TANF Restrictions and Requirements on State MOE funds Under the Three Funding OptionsState May Choose Various State Funding Options for Providing Cash Assistance - ContinuedOne-Third of Families Recieving Cash Assistance Are Child Only Cases Not Subject to federal Work Requirements or Time LimitsFigure 1: Reasons For Child-Only casesTable 2: Fiscal Year 2000 Required All-family Work Participation Rate for each State After Factoringin Caseload Reduction Credit (Stated Rate was 40 Percent )States Use Flexibility under PRWORA to Exempt Some Families from Federal Work Requirements States EXcluded 11Percent of Adult Families From Federal and State Time LimitsFigure 2: Number of Stateswith Exclusions to Federal or State Time Limits by Recipient CharacteristicFigure 3: Percentage of families with Adults Excluded from time limits and Method of ExlusionStates' Experiences with TANF Highlight Issues for ReauthorizationStates Support TANF Flexibility, but Some States Have ConcernsState's Experiences With Adequacy of the 20 Percent Federal Extension May Change as More Families Reach Time LimitsAppendix I: State's Chiild-Only Caseloads and Reasons for Child-Only CasesAppendix I: State's Chiild-Only Caseloads and Reasons for Child-Only Cases - ContinuedAppendix II: State Funding ChoicesTable 3: funding Streams and the District and ColumbiaAppendix III: Percentage of TANF Or MOE Families with Adult Recipients in Each State not Subject to Federal or State Time LimitsAppendix IV: StateBy State information on State Funding, Application of Time limits, and Use of 20 Percent Extension Appendix IV: State By State Information on State Funding, Application of Time LimitsRelated GAO Products
Administration
Comptroller General 2002 States Are Using TANF Flexibility to Adapt Work Requirements and Time Limits to Meet State and Local NeedsStates Are Using TANF Flexibility to Adapt Work Requirements and Time Limits to Meet State and Local NeedsFederal RequirementsSummaryTANF Establishes Time Limitsand Work Requirements for Adults Recieving AidTANF Establishes Time Limitsand Work Requirements for Adults Recieving Aid - ContinuedState May Choose Various State Funding Options for Providing Cash AssistanceTable 1: Application of Key TANF Restrictions and Requirements on State MOE funds Under the Three Funding OptionsState May Choose Various State Funding Options for Providing Cash Assistance - ContinuedOne-Third of Families Recieving Cash Assistance Are Child Only Cases Not Subject to federal Work Requirements or Time LimitsFigure 1: Reasons For Child-Only casesTable 2: Fiscal Year 2000 Required All-family Work Participation Rate for each State After Factoringin Caseload Reduction Credit (Stated Rate was 40 Percent )States Use Flexibility under PRWORA to Exempt Some Families from Federal Work Requirements States EXcluded 11Percent of Adult Families From Federal and State Time LimitsFigure 2: Number of Stateswith Exclusions to Federal or State Time Limits by Recipient CharacteristicFigure 3: Percentage of families with Adults Excluded from time limits and Method of ExlusionStates' Experiences with TANF Highlight Issues for ReauthorizationStates Support TANF Flexibility, but Some States Have ConcernsState's Experiences With Adequacy of the 20 Percent Federal Extension May Change as More Families Reach Time LimitsAppendix I: State's Chiild-Only Caseloads and Reasons for Child-Only CasesAppendix I: State's Chiild-Only Caseloads and Reasons for Child-Only Cases - ContinuedAppendix II: State Funding ChoicesTable 3: funding Streams and the District and ColumbiaAppendix III: Percentage of TANF Or MOE Families with Adult Recipients in Each State not Subject to Federal or State Time LimitsAppendix IV: StateBy State information on State Funding, Application of Time limits, and Use of 20 Percent Extension Appendix IV: State By State Information on State Funding, Application of Time LimitsRelated GAO Products
Comptroller General 2002
States Are Using TANF Flexibility to Adapt Work Requirements and Time Limits to Meet State and Local NeedsStates Are Using TANF Flexibility to Adapt Work Requirements and Time Limits to Meet State and Local NeedsFederal RequirementsSummaryTANF Establishes Time Limitsand Work Requirements for Adults Recieving AidTANF Establishes Time Limitsand Work Requirements for Adults Recieving Aid - ContinuedState May Choose Various State Funding Options for Providing Cash AssistanceTable 1: Application of Key TANF Restrictions and Requirements on State MOE funds Under the Three Funding OptionsState May Choose Various State Funding Options for Providing Cash Assistance - ContinuedOne-Third of Families Recieving Cash Assistance Are Child Only Cases Not Subject to federal Work Requirements or Time LimitsFigure 1: Reasons For Child-Only casesTable 2: Fiscal Year 2000 Required All-family Work Participation Rate for each State After Factoringin Caseload Reduction Credit (Stated Rate was 40 Percent )States Use Flexibility under PRWORA to Exempt Some Families from Federal Work Requirements States EXcluded 11Percent of Adult Families From Federal and State Time LimitsFigure 2: Number of Stateswith Exclusions to Federal or State Time Limits by Recipient CharacteristicFigure 3: Percentage of families with Adults Excluded from time limits and Method of ExlusionStates' Experiences with TANF Highlight Issues for ReauthorizationStates Support TANF Flexibility, but Some States Have ConcernsState's Experiences With Adequacy of the 20 Percent Federal Extension May Change as More Families Reach Time LimitsAppendix I: State's Chiild-Only Caseloads and Reasons for Child-Only CasesAppendix I: State's Chiild-Only Caseloads and Reasons for Child-Only Cases - ContinuedAppendix II: State Funding ChoicesTable 3: funding Streams and the District and ColumbiaAppendix III: Percentage of TANF Or MOE Families with Adult Recipients in Each State not Subject to Federal or State Time LimitsAppendix IV: StateBy State information on State Funding, Application of Time limits, and Use of 20 Percent Extension Appendix IV: State By State Information on State Funding, Application of Time LimitsRelated GAO Products
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us
Click
here for thousands of PDF manuals